Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to keep old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers.
From pats time, human beings as social creatures always have looked for others to find good and trusty companions in order to share secrets and spent time. As a result, throughout history, friends have played a prevailing role in human’s success. In this regard, there is a long-standing, heated debate among people about whether it is beneficial to keep old friends or make new friends. Some people are leading proponents of the claim that it is more favorable to strike up friendship with new individuals. However, from my own perspective, this statement is false; as a matter of fact, I fundamentally disagree with such people and I strongly recommend that individuals take their old friends as an essential part of their lives and try to save them. In the subsequence paragraphs, I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to aptly elaborate on my standpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that old friends are plainly aware of our weaknesses and strengthens. In other words, they are familiar with our characteristics. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by recent social ground-breaking research conducted in our country, indicate that one of the integral factors in everyone’s success is friends. Consequently, close and old friends are able to make an excellent contribution to relieve desperation and stress in tough situations and life hardships. In addition, that makes them be such a motivator to help us making improvements and reaching our goals in life. Old friends, therefore, know us better, even better than ourselves and could be supportive.
Furthermore, it is established beyond doubt that trust between two old friends is stronger compared with a recently developed friendship. Seldom do folks could trust people who they have met recently. In fact, nowadays, due to accomplishing their aims, majority of folks do not hesitate defrauding and do what they can even if they do harm to others. Take a personal experience as an example; when I was a student in Tabriz University, the last semester, one of the students, who I did not know him clearly, asked me a favor to send my undergraduate project and he said that he does not copy my assignments. I trusted him and emailed the draft of my project. Unfortunately, he had sent the same project to tutor before I did and I forced to explain whole story to the tutor. Had I not believed him, I would have not faced such difficult situation. Hence, finding such friends to whom you trust and passed that stage of acquiring your trust is scarce.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that to cement current relationship with old friends instead of making new friends leads more advantageous consequences. In is anticipated that if people strengthen their old friendships, they will take advantage of such friends as contributing factor in thriving in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to make' or 'make'.
Suggestion: to make; make
...kes them be such a motivator to help us making improvements and reaching our goals in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07352941176 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07831253291 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577731092437 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4602656185 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.772727273 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25094056333 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065933031234 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573343630931 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152002660533 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382692135255 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.