Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more effective if teachers let students learn record lecture before class and discuss
and practice during class.
There is no doubt about the issue that learning plays a pivotal role mostly for people living in this developing era. Teachers always try to improve their skills and find a better way in order to improve the level of learning of their students in order that they always face many methods and try to choose a suitable one. Although some teachers believe that they are the only person who can teach students and learning has an important place rather than practicing, others argue that students can learn anything by themselves, and class time is a gold time for practicing more knowledge learned by students. I am, personally, of the opinion of the latter group of teachers, and I elaborate on this issue in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, in the shade of improving technologies and a lot of E-materials provided students can learn any things which they want so teachers can allocate class time to practice more and it is a better way which helps students to establish their knowledge. As a matter of fact, in this developing era, social media such as televisions and web pages can help students to better understand the class materials. To elaborate on this issue I can talk about one of my memories. When I went to high school, my botany teacher tried to do a new method in her class. She wanted us to read before the class and wrote anything which we did not understand from the class material on the paper. After that, she wanted us to find our questions and in-class time, she asked many questions about that issue and worked with us on many extracurricular books. In the shade of this issue, almost all of us could have a great grade at a university’s pre exams. Had she not played this method, we could not achieve a great grade on that exam.
Secondly, if teachers devote class time to teach course material, it is hard for them to find a suitable time for practicing more and more because students when can better understand the class issue that they work on it more and more and someone, most of them is teachers, oversees and supervises them and correct the misunderstanding’s terms of their students. Take a student who just learns huge information without practicing on them as a vivid example; so they could not tackle problems when they face practically, and this may affect other aspects of their life such as their function on exams or even more the future of work because they have most knowledge without finding the importance and how they can use them. In addition, teachers can help their students with this method to stand on their feet and improve self-confidence when they face new problems. Therefore, it can help them in other aspects of their life.
All in all, using this method can improve students' skills not only in learning and better establishing course materials in their mind but it also provided a suitable time for teachers to find students misunderstandings. Also, students nurturing with this method can find more self-confidence and better stand on their own feet when facing new issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, no doubt, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2513.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76850094877 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69722314469 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442125237192 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.5339780399 48.9658058833 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.611111111 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2777777778 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208830722875 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749780289408 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605461044557 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145455535069 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320852172238 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.