Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It becomes paramount for the person to manage their time according to the situation. Some have to do a large task withing a day while others only do the little work by time. If I have to choose a between a few days with a relentless work and the a light work for more days, I will go for a light work because it is more enjoyable during or after the work. In the subsequent paragraph, I will discuss the reason and prove my stand cogently.

First, a short period time for longer day can be effective to maintain a good health during a work time. In this work schedule, people have to do less work without bearing a any physical health issue and mental pressure. Actually, there is less chance of being a weariness. In contrast, with the pressure of a heavy work and nettlesome task in few days straight bring the mental pressure and drain the energy of the body in that extent, a person might go through a sickness and physical harm eventhough he/she will get the plenty of time later in the weekend. For instance, during my college time, I used to do part time job in the local coffee resturant running my study alongside with it. At that time, I required to balance my work and study at the same time. So, I decided to choose a few hours to do work in the whole weekend so that I would not have to bear much pressure in the both work and study. In fact, this tricks really worked well at that time, I felt very fresh even after doing some work and was able to give time also to my study. However, If I choosed to work a big pile of work in short time, I would definitely deal with mental distress for managing a good grade.

Again, doing less work in long time can be fruitful as it is more like a casual work out of getting relax and money at the same time. Actually, people may feel monotonous with their study work and by doing the part time work, they will rejuvenate themselves by meeting a new people, sharing a joke and learning something with a smooth pace. However, in the long time work, we get busy with the same matter over and over again and feel bored with task. As our brain need to relax and want a different task to break the anxiety in the particular situation, a successive short time work really helpful.

To sum up, to the above aforementioned reasons, working a less time for long time is equally enjoyable and healthy.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...n a few days with a relentless work and the a light work for more days, I will go for...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...le have to do less work without bearing a any physical health issue and mental pr...
^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...e, during my college time, I used to do part time job in the local coffee resturant runni...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal distress for managing a good grade. Again, doing less work in long time can ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... with their study work and by doing the part time work, they will rejuvenate themselves b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cessive short time work really helpful. To sum up, to the above aforementioned r...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, may, really, so, well, while, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in short, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31151241535 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30328185144 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471783295711 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7978032184 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6111111111 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241263861003 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948352275196 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063502749399 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176059625228 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691841920511 0.0645574589148 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...n a few days with a relentless work and the a light work for more days, I will go for...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...le have to do less work without bearing a any physical health issue and mental pr...
^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...e, during my college time, I used to do part time job in the local coffee resturant runni...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal distress for managing a good grade. Again, doing less work in long time can ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... with their study work and by doing the part time work, they will rejuvenate themselves b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cessive short time work really helpful. To sum up, to the above aforementioned r...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, may, really, so, well, while, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in short, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31151241535 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30328185144 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471783295711 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7978032184 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6111111111 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241263861003 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948352275196 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063502749399 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176059625228 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691841920511 0.0645574589148 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.