Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Whether working for long hours with only three days a week is desirable or not? When it comes to the question of more days with fewer hours or fewer days with more hours, the answer differs from individual to individual. Some are adamant that they prefer to enjoy fewer days with long hours to do their entertainment, while others squarely hold the opposite statement. Both arguments are convincing and stand on a point, yet my experience and real-life example lead me to conclude that working more days with fewer hours is ideal. More reasons and examples are shed light on as follows.
To begin with, I value body health, and working fewer hours per day can achieve this goal. For example, I can have time to exercise in the gym every day after work to strengthen my body health. That is to say, I will not easily get sick to influence my life. Moreover, I will not overwork to damage body health, and headaches and less energy are common results of overworking. On the contrary, working few days and longer hours means that I should work about 12 hours or even more. Undoubtedly, it will not only decrease our time of sleeping and also hurt my body.
In addition, it is important for me to have efficiency at work, and working fewer hours can improve my work efficiency. For instance, in accordance with many scientifical theories, people will perform better in only 6 hours, when over these hours, people's concentration and energy will reduce so that the efficiency can not maintain at a high rate. However, if people continue to work for a long time, they might easily be distracted by many entertainment or video on Youtube. It wastes time to stay at the office and pretend themselves still working hard.
Last but not least, salary is the vital factor for me to choose the work, and working for more days but fewer hours usually has high salary. Take the work in Taiwan as an example, most high salary work means that it contains much professional skill and knowledge, and high-tech jobs usually have fewer work hours to maintain their creativity and ability of managing problems. To be more specific, engineers, which work fewer hours but should work five days a week, have relatively high salaries in Taiwan. However, operators, which only operate machines in the factory for extremely long hours, have lower salaries.
In conclusion, working fewer hours and longer days is my desire decision. Salary, health, and efficiency are my indispensable factors to choose the job.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hours'' or 'hour's'?
Suggestion: hours'; hour's
...e contrary, working few days and longer hours means that I should work about 12 hours...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun entertainment seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much entertainment', 'a good deal of entertainment'.
Suggestion: much entertainment; a good deal of entertainment
...ime, they might easily be distracted by many entertainment or video on Youtube. It wastes time to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80841121495 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53898333393 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5791696751 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378468689339 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13430057451 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936913179099 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223545615233 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769622074891 0.0645574589148 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.