Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and example to support answer.
It is generally accepted that people need to have a reseaonable hours for working during the day. Some people believe that working five days a week for less hours is much more better that working three days for long hours; nevertheless, other people do not think so. However, it is challanging for us to prefer one to another because both of them have their advantages and disadvantages. As a matter of fact, there are numerous reasons why working five days during a week is more attractive, and I would explore only a few primary ones here.
In the beginning, the first aspect to point is that working in a sutiable time leads to increase people's productivity in their career due to the fact that they will not be tired during the work day. In fact, work hours should be defined according to some significant features of people includes not only power but also energy. For example, tow group of workers with different work hours are examined in other to find a apt hours that they have a maximum amount of prodactivity for working during a day. After that, some workers ,who had worked more that 12 hours, have lowest amount of yield. Hence, paying attention to time that people will work is critical.
Second, the most persuasive point is that tow days in a week is enough for every people to spend their time with family. Also increasing this time to more days will has some disadvantages such as the lack of sufficent focus on work. To illustrate this point only needs refer to a car company where their workers have to work for long time during the day, even if they have around four day as holiday. Given this issue, every week when they come back of holiday, they were not acpable of concentrating on their work. Thus, if free day during the day is extended to more than tow days, it would leads to creat some problems for people.
From what has been dusscused above, we may safely draw the conclusion that people should have an approprite work hours; therefore, enhancing people's output and having a great time to spend with family are considerable factors in work conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple need to have a reseaonable hours for working during the day. Some people beli...
^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...lieve that working five days a week for less hours is much more better that working three ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...lieve that working five days a week for less hours is much more better that working ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...five days a week for less hours is much more better that working three days for long hours;...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oup of workers with different work hours are examined in other to find a apt hour...
^^
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rk hours are examined in other to find a apt hours that they have a maximum amou...
^
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'hour'?
Suggestion: hour
...rs are examined in other to find a apt hours that they have a maximum amount of prod...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey have a maximum amount of prodactivity for working during a day. After that, so...
^^
Line 2, column 530, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g during a day. After that, some workers ,who had worked more that 12 hours, have ...
^^
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the lowest'.
Suggestion: have the lowest
...ers ,who had worked more that 12 hours, have lowest amount of yield. Hence, paying attentio...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...people to spend their time with family. Also increasing this time to more days will ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... increasing this time to more days will has some disadvantages such as the lack of ...
^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...xtended to more than tow days, it would leads to creat some problems for people. Fr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64324324324 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41757625427 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508108108108 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8969189737 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.533333333 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366515721764 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146408819932 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761839778611 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242782315839 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887727223353 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.