Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As it has been said before “business before pleasure”, many people prefer to work five days for shorter time rather than working for longer time. However, personally, I prefer to work three days a week for longer hours instead of working five days for less hours.
Working for three days and long hours can provide more quality time with family. Imagine you are working for three days only, that’s mean you would have four days off. Within these four days, you can spend many hours with your family and beloved ones. In fact, it would sound great if you have pre-school kids who are not attending any school, so you would be more available for their care and spending more time with them.
Besides having more family time, with three-days working days, a person can often have vacations than working five-days a week. Some employees who work for three days can combine their off days with short holidays or weekends and then they can travel for a short visit. As an example, employees can join their off days with Columbus Holidays and they can have around five to seven days off where they can travel to another state for a short vacation.
Adding to the other point, people who work for three days may work as a part-time job in another place and earn more money. If you worked for five days, it would be hard for you to work for another job. Nevertheless, if you worked for three days, you might work partially for another job and earn more many from both jobs. Interestingly, if a person works in another job that offers the same three days full time working hours, it would be amazing because the person would work for two full-time jobs for six days and earn double his/her salary.
While some people could say that working for a long period of time is stressful. Yet, working for five days is more stressful and need a hard-working person. On the other hand, working only for three days is less effortless because the employees would have many off days that they can rest at home, spend time with things that they like, and reset their energy. Unlike working for five days, the person would not have enough off days to rest and do other activities.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that individuals would enjoy more if they worked for three days rather than five days a week. I feel it in this way because I see that working for three days can let people spend much time with their families, help to have more vacations, and can earn more money for their future plans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
... hours instead of working five days for less hours. Working for three days and long hou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... hours instead of working five days for less hours. Working for three days and lo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 404, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...her job that offers the same three days full time working hours, it would be amazing beca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 53, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...eople could say that working for a long period of time is stressful. Yet, working for five day...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earn more money for their future plans.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, while, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63228699552 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18060826008 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421524663677 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6901304119 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.736842105 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4736842105 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63157894737 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504396897354 0.236089414692 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231502538782 0.076458572812 303% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817585118184 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317792315822 0.150856017488 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376523142001 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.