Some students prefer to study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In recent times, there has been a widespread debate on the way that students should study. While some of them prefer to study alone to avoid any interruption from other people, I hold the opposite view. I think students should study in a group to get more benefits.
To begin with, scholars will correct any study mistakes when they study together in one group. They can notice each other’s errors faster when they discuss the topic in a group. For example, when I was at Ohio University, I had a physics class about the concept of gravity. I did not understand the concept well from the professor, so I went to some online websites to read about it. It was a very complicated topic, but I was able to understand it. Then, I had a study group with my friends John and Sam. At first, everyone had the time to explain the concept of gravity through his understanding. At that time, I realized that my understanding of gravity was wrong. Thus, my friend John corrected the wrong thoughts about this topic. Indeed, I would not be able to know the truth if I did not have this study group.
On to of that, when scholars have a study group, they will be more concentrated. Most of the time, students fall to sleep when they study alone in their room. Studying in a group will encourage students to proceed and get some energy from each other. For example, I used to study with my friend John at Panera Bread, so when I feel tired or dizzy, John makes some exercises with me or asks me some questions to wake me up. Indeed, studying in a group is more energetic than studying alone.
In conclusion, I encourage scholars to have a study group during their school period. This will help them to correct their mistakes and be more focus.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48264984227 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45635407213 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495268138801 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7860848058 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.05 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.85 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257885958945 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834392551392 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742939446667 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163562100039 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785931582333 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.