Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

How a government should spend its budget is one of the most controversial questions between researchers and even common people. Daily many articles are published to deal with it, which is a sign of the subject's importance. Some people are of the opinion that by improving the internet's infrastructures, the quality of people's life will grow significantly; While, I believe that transportation is a more important subject for the government to spend money. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I am going to explore in the following.

First and foremost, transportation directly relates to our environment, and eventually to our health. If we have not good public transportation people will find a big desire to use their private cars; it gives rise to more traffic and more using gas. The final result is clear, a large amount of carbon dioxide and dangerous tiny particles will release to the environment. Based on a report from Stanford university's researchers, augmenting public transportation's quality around 20 percent will lead to a significant decline in lung diseases between people. Therefore; besides its undeniable advantages for society people, governments could see public transportation as a great strategy for reducing healthcare costs.

Second, in many countries, preparing and increasing internet quality are not the government's obligations; private companies are in charge of the Internet and its quality. This method has two main benefits for people; the competition between private companies gives rise to the reduction in costs and augmenting internet accessibility for people. Therefore, it is better for governments to spend their time, budget and energy to deal with public transportation problems.

Nowadays, there are wide varieties of jobs; careers are became more professional, and the cities are going to be large and larger. Many companies have the desire to employe professional persons without respect to the employees' locations. These changes prompt people's movements and traveling grow in big cities. To combat these problems, a government should be more careful about public transportation. We live in a chain process and public transportation is a key element in this system. With a simple disturbing in Public transportation, the whole system will find trouble. In contrast, by damage to the internet, the problem will not be huge like the public transportation problem.

To wrap up, I believe that by increasing public transportation quality, we will have a healthier life, and government can save money. It is better private companies deal with the internet and its problems because the competition between them leads to an increase in quality and reducing costs. We live in a chain system and disturbing in transportation causes many problems for the whole system.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'subjects'' or 'subject's'?
Suggestion: subjects'; subject's
...to deal with it, which is a sign of the subjects importance. Some people are of the opin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ecline in lung diseases between people. Therefore; besides its undeniable advantages for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 57, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...are wide varieties of jobs; careers are became more professional, and the cities are g...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, i feel, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2390.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.407239819 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17973688276 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502262443439 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2735690145 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.636363636 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13636363636 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204110641539 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604583476271 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528435018846 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123750495997 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352928950266 0.0645574589148 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.