Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, there is a heated controversy over whether governments should spend more money to make Internet access better or to facilitate public transportation. As far as I am concerned, governments should allocate more financial budget to improve public transportation rather than Internet access, as it leads to more advantages for the community in terms of the quality of life as well as environment problems, which are elaborated upon hereunder.
First, without any shadow of a doubt, decent public transportation facilities have more significant effects on dwellers' daily life than quality Internet access. In other words, transportation constitutes a considerable part of residents' life, as they need to travel distances so that they can reach their destination. For example, they use different kinds of transportation--that is--public, private, share, to get to their work or universities. Although there are a great number of private cars on the streets, many people prefer using public transportation rather than private cars. However, people who use public transportation are usually less than those who do not use it. They usually complain about the low quality and being insufficient public transportation. With this in mind, governments can satisfy their residents by improving its public transportation.
Second, it is obvious that many governments have trouble with their air pollution, and they search for different ways to tackle this issue. Increasing the rate of public transportation using would have a significant influence on reducing air pollution. Governments can improve public transportation to encourage more people to use it.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I believe governments should pay more financial attention to the improvement of public transportation rather than Internet access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sportation rather than Internet access.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 277.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70036101083 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36373378862 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5559566787 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5233112518 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.461538462 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308581380905 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126937676888 0.076458572812 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734242864636 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216943113399 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397102805305 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.