Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to
improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, in which we live, city managers and administrators face with a wide variety of choices that everyone has positive or negative consequences. In this line of thought, so many experts hold the conviction that it is crucial for governors to dedicate money to improve internet access rather that to develop public transportation systems. Others, on the contrary, stand on the other side of the continuum. I, Personally, concur with the former notion because of necessary need to internet in today's world and immense applications of internet in modern lives, which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, living in the age of the technology necessitate the availability of the internet in every corner of the city. To clarify more, internet is the base of virtually every single task which individuals are doing in today's societies. From elementary schools to the collage and universities all use internet every moment to assist student to learn cutting edge and practical science. For example, as a university student my classmate and I use internet every day to fined related materials to lessons and courses which help us to be prepared for exam and get satisfactory results. Not only student but also householders and mothers obtain their need from internet in a very convenient and cheap way. My mother, for example, have tens of website in the list of her favorites that teach her how to cock better. Therefore, it is hoped that governors assist general public with making internet accessible everywhere.
Secondly, internet plays a key role in the new generation of professions. To be more specific, with the genesis of the internet a wide variety of job positions were made available for individuals, which most of them suit new generations tests even more than others. My brother experience would put this notion into a vivid picture. He is only 20 years old, with no higher education degree and is making money more than me with a master degree. In fact, spending more than six hours per day on internet assist him to learn programing language by himself and he is working with major economical companies as a programmer. had my brother not access to internet to learn about his favorite job, he would not have been able to work, make money, and enjoy from it. Thus making internet available for all people help governors in providing more job position for people.
To wrap it up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons bring us to the conclusion that it is more beneficial if governors spend more money on making internet accessible for all people. For most of the people in the society use internet for different purposes, and because Internet provide governors a golden solution for unemployment issue in today's societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to cut'.
Suggestion: to cut
...every moment to assist student to learn cutting edge and practical science. For example...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 862, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...fore, it is hoped that governors assist general public with making internet accessible everywh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to program'.
Suggestion: to program
...per day on internet assist him to learn programing language by himself and he is working w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Had
...r economical companies as a programmer. had my brother not access to internet to le...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in fact, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01731601732 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82459819768 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1920807385 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273925347092 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808551293761 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541707897205 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172609864488 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236021409415 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.