Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is ridiculous to say that the government should invest more money for the internet access than the public transportation even in the world full of promising technologically. My disagreement for the statement can be proved by the following points.
Since the people safety and comfort associated with public transportation, its development should not be compromised. Common people have to use public means on daily basis whether they have to go work and travel for the many places. If there will be means in the ruinous state, they might caught the accident. Again, we have seen a lot of the people get suffocated in the public transportation due to the less faculty. For the betterment of the public also its investment is exigent.
Another reason for prioritizing transportation is to deliver the product easily and quickly. For the global economy and expanding settlement, some stuff might not be available in the market. By good transportation system, in a snap of the finger anything will be available; otherwise we have to go through the serious economic crisis. This is one of the key aspects differ in the developing and developed country. In developing country, poor public transportation cause higher price for the product, while in the developed country, anything will be available in the cheap price due to its swift nature.
All in all, it is worst idea to prioritize internet access over the transportation. The transportation demand and model should be flexible in changing time; as it is necessary in good shape and form at all the time, it should be also give massive focus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by the following points. Since the people safety and comfort associated wit...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the worst'.
Suggestion: is the worst
...to its swift nature. All in all, it is worst idea to prioritize internet access over...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 265.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04618302849 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554716981132 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5987528148 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7142857143 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.35714285714 5.45110844103 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175934097429 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646510676016 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606766859015 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121495260524 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856290344052 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.