Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the rapid development of technology, Internet is becoming more and more popular among people. Certainly, it is extraordinary beneficial for people to use computer. Therefore, some people state that government should spend money improving Internet access. In contrast, I strongly believe that it is better and more important for governments to do something for the public transportation, for it can save many people's time, benefit more people and reduce pollution.
With the advancement of public transportation, people can save the amount of time. As is known to us, as the increasing of private cars, there are many traffic jams, especially rush hours. Therefore, some people have no choice but to stay at the bus , which extremely waste their time. For example, my mother has to get up early to take the bus, for she is usually faced with traffic jam and crowed people. In order to arrive at her company on time, she must get up early to catch the bus, which exceedingly wastes my mother's time. If governments improve the public transportation, maybe there are fewer traffic jams and people no need to trap into the bus during the time of traffic jam.
Compared with Internet access, public transportation could benefit more people. In reality, it is possible for everyone to take the public transportation, while not every one have the ability to operating computers. Even though the rising popularity of Internet, many people do not know how to make great use of Internet access, such as some the elderly. For example, my grandmother has no idea about how to use the mobile phone and even the computer. However, she takes the public transportation frequently. Therefore, to benefit more people, governments are supposed to spend money on public transportation rather than improving Internet access.
The Improvement of public transportation can also reduce pollution. With the huge number of private cars, there is serious air pollution. It is known to us, cars emit the amount of toxic gas and carbon dioxide, which cause global warming and air pollution. One reason for people to buy cars is the lack of well-developed and good public transportation system. If governments dedicate much money to improving it, the majority of people are likely to take public transportation instead of driving. The decreasing of driving will relieve severe pollution.
In a word, since public transportation could ensure to help people save time, benefit more people, and protect environment, governments should think highly of it and spend money improving it. As the public transportation, people can benefit more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le have no choice but to stay at the bus , which extremely waste their time. For e...
^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bus, which exceedingly wastes my mothers time. If governments improve the public ...
^^
Line 2, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time. If governments improve the public transportation, maybe there are fewer tr...
^^
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...public transportation, maybe there are fewer traffic jams and people no need to trap into th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amount of toxic gas and carbon dioxide, which cause global warming and air pollu...
^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll relieve severe pollution. In a word, since public transportation could ensure...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18203309693 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97114025911 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465721040189 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0980568939 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309470924004 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10079679905 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816212731529 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202244044524 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872097464753 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.