Renewable sources of energy will soon replace fossil fuels.
The energy is one essential kind of source for people’ daily life. Without energy, it will be extremely difficult for people. However, nowadays, people tend to increasingly use renewable energy, such as sun and water. Therefore, I strongly believe that renewable sources of energy will take the place of fossil fuels sooner or later.
First of all, an advancement the technology makes it possible to explore and employ new forms of energy. Obviously, with tremendous breakthrough of relative technology, scientists have gotten through the challenges and difficulties of reaching to renewable energy. In the past, we had no choice but to be in use of the fossil fuels like gasoline, which have been providing us with more benefits. Contrast to in the past, now we have more choices. Thanks to the appearance of water and wind energy, most families choose to try these renewable sources. My family had already used natural gas to warm all rooms in the winter. In fact, more and more family and companies started to use like natural gas that kind of energy.
Besides, unlike renewable sources of energy, fossil fuels is exceeding limited. From past to now, we had employed the huge amount of fossil fuels, such as oil and gas. As is known to us, it takes a long time to form usable coals and gasoline. However, we particularly rely on fossil fuels and use them frequently. With the slow process and endless consuming, I believe that fossil fuels will be exhausted fast. Comparing with fossil fuels, renewable sources of energy will not face that sort of difficulties. We make full use of natural resources like wind, which will not disappear.
What’s more, the governments positively encourage people to take advantage of renewable energy. Relative companies are able to receive the funds and support from the governments, which fairly helps them develop renewable energy. Additionally, governments close some coals companies which emit mass harmful substance to environment. As a result, renewable sources are popular with people.
In a word, fossil fuels which have shown many disadvantages compare to renewable energy. The rising popularity of new energy and the improvement of technology will make it affordable and will substitute for the conventional fossil fuel
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, as to, in fact, kind of, sort of, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18428184282 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79608876498 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523035230352 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3185935867 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7083333333 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305099717156 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991000620847 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113154854836 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202312426977 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109468045154 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.