Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today’s turbulent economic environment, it is difficult for governments to decide which areas they should spend money on. Some people believe that it is important to spend money improving internet access, while others feel that it is preferable to prioritize public transportation. In my opinion, although the internet is of great importance these days, governments should financially support the public transportation. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be explored in the following essay.
To begin with, the development of transit services leads to improvements in people’s health in a society. Large cities are faced with a huge increase in car ownership, which not only has a negative effect on the traffic flow, but also contribute to many health problems. Cars emit toxic gases, and if the amount of these gases surpasses the specified limitation, the situation will become perilous, especially for older people and children, who are more vulnerable. As a result of this, people can barely breath fresh air and many lung diseases and other respiratory problems will increase. For example, last week, I read an article in a major newspaper about car pollutions and how it affects people health. According to that article, the research has indicated that when a city suffers from air pollution problem for a couple of days, the number of patients going to a hospital due to respiratory problems and severe headaches reach its highest point in a year. By developing a more efficient public transportation system, the emission of toxic gases will reduce and thus people can enjoy better health.
Moreover, public transportation has an increasingly important role in economic growth of a country. The development in transit services will generate more jobs and for the unemployed population. Also, investment in public transport can influence the functioning of labor market and their productivity, since they can easily use public transport to get to their destinations with lower costs. This increase in using this transit services will result in increased wealth for many companies. My own observation is a compelling example of this. Last year, I visited a manufacturing company that produced wagons. The manager of the company stated that after the recent renovations in the city’s subway system, people tend to use it more often and as a result he had established a second company in order to be able to answer the demands. This example clearly demonstrates how the improvement in public transport system can enable economic growth.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that in order to prevent health problems and enhance economic growth, the government should choose to fund developments in public transit systems rather than the internet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30337078652 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93953199978 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4485223815 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253581811615 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742063535925 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561515040749 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154388016459 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751503746977 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.