Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is a tough decision for a country's rulers to decide how to spend the budget on many projects that have more benefits in the long term and shorter time. Public transporting and internet access are two critical parts of society, and both need great attention. There is an argument either a country should spend more on internet access or transportation. I personally believe investing in the Internet has more benefits for the whole people. There is a lot of reasons for this claim, which two of them that have great importance elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First of all, one of the significant governments' responsibilities is creating a proper situation for businesses and companies to make more jobs for seekers. In today's world, most of the jobs will become internet-base, and the Internet will be an essential part of every kind of job. This internet-based jobs will decrease the transporting, and many people can handle their works from home or in their offices. A prominent example of this is banking issues; every person can transform money, pay bills, and charge their accounts by using the Internet, and they would not need to go out at all. This situation helps them to save time and energy, and they would not need to go out. It will have benefits for both society and governments and decline the dependency on transporting.
Moreover, most cities have a good foundation for transporting systems and only need maintenance and repair. So, this does not need much budget to spend. In contrast, the Internet is a new phenomenon, and it changes rapidly and needs more attention and renovation of the foundation. If a country has an up-to-dated internet, it will help the economy to improve faster, and these excellent economies provide money to spend on other parts such as transporting systems.
To sum up, governments should invest in both Internet and the transporting system as they are essential for society. But, in my view, investing more in Internet have more benefits: first, it provides a better situation for companies and helps the public in general to save money and time; Second, the transporting system needs less money to spend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, in contrast, in general, kind of, such as, first of all, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9696969697 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87106005358 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509641873278 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1616419479 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.117647059 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252388105668 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846176319847 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454718882539 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166370708649 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436570389324 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.