Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Many people have different perspectives of whether the governments should focus on the development of Internet access rather than public transportations. However, I disagree with the statement that the governments should spend money to improve Internet access rather than improve public transportation based on two following reasons.

To begin with, public transportation is one of the fundamental constructions of a country, the citizens rely on public transportation to send them to the place they work, study or reside. It is not reasonable that there is no buses for the students to commute to their school, and there is no subway for the workers to go to their company. Although some people may argue that the parents can drive their children to the school, then they drive their car to the company. In the reality, not everyone can afford buy a car, there are many people with lower income need public transportation to maintain their living. Transportation is the duty for the government, and they should prioritize the funding of public transportation before any other policies.

Admittedly, Internet become more important than the past due to its convenience access to the world database. Thus, people may eager to access to internet everywhere. However it overstates the importance of the internet. In most cases, the knowledge which internet can be searched for, can also be found in the library. For example, if students want to look up for dictionary for their homework, they don't need to access to the internet. A dictionary can be sufficient for them. On the other hand, if the researchers in the university need to survey for journals or papers from other countries, the main library facilitates the Internet access. There is not necessary to insist to improve the Internet access that much.

Furthermore, the world tends to protect our environment because of the severe pollution. If governments improve the public transportation, and people would use buses and subways instead of driving their own cars. The issue to air pollution can be solved, and the earth can be beneficial from it.

To sum up, it is more important for governments to spend their funding on public transportations. Because the public transportations are daily requirements for the citizens, and they can decrease air pollutions. In many circumstances, the Internet access can be replace by books from the libraries. That is the reasons why I strongly disagree with the argument.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no buses'?
Suggestion: there are no buses
...dy or reside. It is not reasonable that there is no buses for the students to commute to their sc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to buy'
Suggestion: to buy
...In the reality, not everyone can afford buy a car, there are many people with lower...
^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eager to access to internet everywhere. However it overstates the importance of the int...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...for dictionary for their homework, they dont need to access to the internet. A dicti...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, for example, in most cases, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06584409258 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7051482114 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5454545455 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344436909271 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109395151264 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960765912677 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209658393481 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103993334577 0.0645574589148 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.