Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money building new housing than preserving historical or traditional buildings and homes.
Building or preserving some constructions is crucial issues for modern government. Owing to specific reasons, such as public, cultural buildings, and unsuitable places, most of governments cannot easily decide to spend more funds building new housing or preserving traditional buildings and home. From my point of view, my standpoints is that governments should preserving historical buildings and homes.
To begin with, preserving historical and traditional buildings and home can benefit the public. If a government tend to build more novel and original buildings, they have to demolish some outdated homes and historical buildings. In this process, this government will avoidably violate and conflict their public’s living, since government might need to destroy their houses and some symbolic buildings that most of people like. In comparison with that, if governments just preserve these traditional buildings, they can basically ensure their public living and social stability. For example, there are a great deal of people to protest governments’ policy of constructing new building every day in my country. Because of building new buildings, lots of people’s home are frequently destroyed by government. Although governments always guarantee that they will timely arrange these people to live in a newer and beautiful houses, most of people still become destitute and homeless today. In the contrast, if governments choose to the policy of preserving, most of people will gain the benefits.
In addition, preserving historical and traditional buildings can bring advantageous effects to country’s economy. For some countries, they have lots of cultural buildings that can become a scenic spots and landscape. Hence, some countries can easily make these traditional buildings become a beauty spot and attract tourists and gain profits. For a instance, some beautiful countries which have lots of beauteous landscapes, such as Japan, Unite States, China, Indian, these countries can always easily attract lots of foreign visitors to go to their countries and see some great scenic spots. In this process, these countries can acquire lots of profits and also drive local businesses quickly progress, such as hotel, restaurants and so on. Therefore, it is logical to say that preserving historical and traditional buildings can bring beneficial effects to a country.
Indeed, there are also some outdated builds that impact appearance of societies, which cannot effectively show the beauty. However, compare to these affairs, trying to build some new buildings must make lots of pollution, which will unquestionably impact whole environment of countries and people’s healthy. Therefore, even if there are some outdated homes and buildings, we should firstly prevent lots of pollution to emerge in our daily life.
Thus, I completely prefer to preserve traditional buildings and homes in a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the governments') or simply say ''most governments''.
Suggestion: most of the governments; most governments
...tural buildings, and unsuitable places, most of governments cannot easily decide to spend more fund...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...houses and some symbolic buildings that most of people like. In comparison with that, if gover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 430, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... buildings that most of people like. In comparison with that, if governments just preserve...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...ability. For example, there are a great deal of people to protest governments’ polic...
^^^^
Line 2, column 928, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...o live in a newer and beautiful houses, most of people still become destitute and homeless tod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1054, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...nts choose to the policy of preserving, most of people will gain the benefits. In addition, p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... attract tourists and gain profits. For a instance, some beautiful countries whic...
^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'can'.
Suggestion: always can
... States, China, Indian, these countries can always easily attract lots of foreign visitors...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62727272727 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92977025021 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484090909091 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7281853615 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.904761905 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9523809524 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320611229438 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127932776963 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862172931218 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219692228478 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943145326057 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.