Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the world nowadays is developed rapidly that many governments think they should spend more money to improve Internet access. However, it is unfounded and superficial that it is more important to improve public transportation.
In some people's ideas, facilitate Internet access can make all citizens' life more convenient and more suitable. When people are searching the internet, slow speed, and lacking download needed to be solved to improve the internet that all publics can have faster online searching and downloading. However, access to the internet is not the primitive prescription that the government should take this prescription before improving transportation. Since many places don't have perfect public transportation such as the bus and the subway so many people need to drive their car to work.t This strategy might cause traffic jam usually during the time of working that makes people nervous and waste their time. Hence, the government should spend the money to make transportation more convenient than the internet.
Some skepticisms still argued that improving internet access can enhance government competition in other countries. Just like the United State has facilitated internet access, such as the 5G technic and the Microsoft even Apple, that makes the United State has a strong ability to fight with other countries. Nevertheless, the government should build perfect welfare first than enhance its competitiveness. The government should improve public transportation to make elders more easily to transport and make more friendly space in transportation to other people like the blinder or pregnant woman. This strategy can make their publics more satisfied with their government.
The most important thing is the public transportation can let people decline their willingness to drive, so the pollution might decline coincidence. Since global warming leads to much harm to our planet and raises the temperature continuing that everyone should protect the Earth. If the government doesn't enact some solution to decline global warming happen, Earth might become weaker and make the climate in danger and harm human civilization in the end. The improvement of internet access is not as urgent as global warming that the government should improve public transportation first to stop global warming to be countinue.
As the aforementioned suggestions, although improving internet access is also important, the government should put it behind the improvement to public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Since the world nowadays is developed rapidly...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...facilitate Internet access can make all citizens life more convenient and more suitable....
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...oving transportation. Since many places dont have perfect public transportation such...
^^^^
Line 2, column 617, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'jam'.
Suggestion: usually jam
...ork.t This strategy might cause traffic jam usually during the time of working that makes p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...coincidence. Since global warming leads to much harm to our planet and raises the ...
^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ld protect the Earth. If the government doesnt enact some solution to decline global w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5890052356 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97622796448 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479057591623 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8449076702 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.588235294 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308004136609 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125957870384 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794296131957 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214726306676 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546425671175 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.