There is no shortage of debate about whether the land is used for human needs to save endangered animals. In my opinion, I firmly believe that it is worthwhile to use the land for the people on the Earth rather than to use it for saving endangered animals. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, we know human beings are the most important creature on Earth because without human beings it is very hard for nature to exist. They play a vital role in balancing the environment. For example, In my village people have used the land for farming which helps them to produce food. They have also built houses for their settlement. In addition, they constructed factories for preparing food from the raw material. As a result, the Environment of our society is pleasant and balanced.
Secondly, It is not necessary for human beings to teach to save the animals. People have the knowledge and they have the sense to protect the animals which are rare on Earth. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I am so emotional that I have feelings towards animals. I love animals at home to which I love most. To save animal's lives at first I have to exist in nature. I use the land for the different purpose; however, I have also thought about the animal which is going to be extinct. So I have a dog at home. I am conscious about the animal lives. I cook food and feed them. I feel that like human beings, the animal has also right to live on Earth. This example illustrates that Human beings have a sense of humor to save all the animals which are found on Earth.
Finally, people can use land in a proper way; they know the value of all the creatures in nature. Moreover, people on Earth play a major role to save animals. People can put certain land for the lives of the animals. For instance, in my village people uses certain part of the land for their personal purpose and remaining parts of the land is used for saving endangered animals. People can figure out the land which is useful to the animals. There is one land that has an environment suitable for the adaption of a tiger; people do not use that land for their personal interest. This shows that all the land can not be used by the people.
To sum up, the evidence that I mention in the above passages is strong enough to convince the statement that I agree with. This is because human beings know the value of animals, which part of the land is suitable for the adaption of animals, and are more emotional to the animals. These are the reasons which are convincing with the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: saving
...not necessary for human beings to teach to save the animals. People have the knowledge ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nimal lives. I cook food and feed them. I feel that like human beings, the animal...
^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...on Earth. Finally, people can use land in a proper way; they know the value of all the creatur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44375 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35559967448 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408333333333 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6003584229 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2365168063 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.8064516129 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4838709677 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61290322581 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0680771982231 0.236089414692 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229062061983 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309228731304 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521890186654 0.150856017488 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307625107107 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 11.7677419355 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.