Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Nowadays with assortment of news sources around us it is almost impossible to stay unaware of what is going on in the world. Some people prefer specific news channels to others, since their thoughts and opinions are in the same direction. Personally, however, I believe watching news on channels with different perspective can be more informative. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, to be a fair judge, we must see all facets of an action. By being conceited and adhereing to the opinion similar to ours, we deprive ourselves from the whole truth. Additionally, people who care about affairs going around them, are chiefly adults and they are mature enough to weigh different sides and decide which side is unerring. Therefore, to be able to conclude judiciously, all we need is the whole truth, not only the part we desire to hear. The war between Russia and Ukraine is a compelling example of that. The day Russia invaded Ukraine, the whole world including me gave the right to Ukraine and convicted Russia. However, the other day I was watching a documentary that contained the main reason of the war. At the end of that, I wasn't quite sure whether Russia should be soley blamed for this war. By broadening my perspective, I concluded that other countries are responsible as well.
Another major reason is that by listening to news different from our default believes, we practice how to listen to counterarguments that challenge our believes. It is crucial in our personal life, to be able to listen to people who are of different opinions than ours. These little critics might help us greatly with our improvement. Furthermore, by listening to other opinions, we make our minds more open and we can get along with more people. Sometimes, we get so prejudiced about our believes that we can't even stand people with different ones. However, if we listen to other's desires and life style, we can see that there is no conflict between their life style and ours. By seeing things from different points of views, we can all live more peacefully together.
In conclusion, although it might be arduous, we'd better listen to news with different base of opinions. It will help us judge more fairly, plus at the same time we can learn how to stand different opinions from ours and get along with peple better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 759, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...eason of the war. At the end of that, I wasnt quite sure whether Russia should be sol...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
... to counterarguments that challenge our believes. It is crucial in our personal life, to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...metimes, we get so prejudiced about our believes that we cant even stand people with dif...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o prejudiced about our believes that we cant even stand people with different ones. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: WED_WE_D[1]
Message: Did you mean 'we'd'?
Suggestion: we'd
...nclusion, although it might be arduous, wed better listen to news with different ba...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78292682927 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61934073109 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541463414634 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4278606433 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1363636364 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130047815012 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433313569781 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392462380212 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959227682723 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434165729893 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.