Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or a new country because of the loss of old social connection.
By and large, as time went by, some people have called into question whether leaving own nation, care to name could bings about we lose our own old friendship or it is hilarious thing and we could keep in touch. There has been no shortages of debates among scholars that social connection is limited and moving a round, like other countries take atoll on that. Thus, I am in bound disagreement with the idea. In what follows, I will delve into the most excellent reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First thing now looping up in my head is that, in the twenty-first century, with the advent of the state-of-the-art technologies, namely the Internet, individuals have this ability to still be in old relationships here there everywhere. In fact, when you head to head to oversee not only do you might establish new relationships with foreigners, but also with simple paths, like surththing on the online platforms be in touch with old friends. Let clarified by personal experience, I fail to remember vividly, but if my mind serves me right, iy was many years ago when I used to make up my mind to head to university in the capital city of my nation. To cut along story short, had I not used the Facebook, a distance communication method, I would have lost school’s friends.
Another thing ought to bear in mind is that one the features of human being is alteration as well as adaptation. Some one; however, have hesitate to make a new friends and go abroad to broaden their horizon, there are a wide range of privileges stemming from this tendency. What I am trying to say is that should we go to other nations or toucans, for vocation, dwelling, and so forth, ones will improve their inter personal relationships whether with new folks or old ones. In fact, they take in how is tit possible to possess win-win circumstance and at least save their durable relationships with old friends.
To sum up, considering the ponds above mentioned, the most retinal conclusion to be draw is that; I have-deeply held belief; albeit, for address the question utterly, I have to be specific due to the fact all group of the society have different view, there are no handicaps for old communications among individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: head-to-head
...ere there everywhere. In fact, when you head to head to oversee not only do you might establ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'head to'.
Suggestion: head to
...ere there everywhere. In fact, when you head to head to oversee not only do you might establish...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Someone'?
Suggestion: Someone
...ng is alteration as well as adaptation. Some one; however, have hesitate to make a new f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'hesitated'.
Suggestion: hesitated
... as adaptation. Some one; however, have hesitate to make a new friends and go abroad to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, thus, well, another thing, at least, in fact, as well as, by and large, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78181818182 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86312243231 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602597402597 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2034797634 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.615384615 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6153846154 20.6045352989 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170509911326 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544252415656 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485506307827 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923305668337 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278462293377 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.