Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It was easier to achieve success in the past than it is today.
Needless to say, one of the most important things which all people like to achieve, because of its impact on all aspects of their lives, is success. Therefore, all people have always been trying to gain success in all aspects of their lives. In this regard, some people believe that achieving success in the modern time is harder than past. I agree with this statement and I will discuss my reasons in the following paragraphs.
Some people believe that in the modern time because of many developments which have been gained, achieving success is easier. According to some sociologists, in the past people were forced to spend much of their times to provide food for themselves, hence they were not able to dedicate much time for development; consequently, it was so hard to gain success in the past. While in the modern time, people spend less time to provide food for their families, because of development of technologies. However, I disagree with this statement, because in the past development was restrict. So gaining success was not hard like modern time, since in the modern time there are a lot of developments in all context which is so difficult to gain new success. You can compare my life with my father's life as the best example for this case. He lived in the small village where there were not illiterate people, hence my father was able to be success person by study just 3 books. While, in my life I have to study around 10 hours per day for around 5 years in order to gain average success. Thus, gaining success in the past is easier than modern time.
Stressful conditions of modern time have negative impact on gaining success. According to the majority of psychologists, concentration is the most important thing which individuals need to gain success in their lives and the stressful situation of modern time led to reduce individuals' concentration. Therefore, these psychologists have posed that gaining success in the modern time is more difficult than past time. I agree with this statement, because crowded circumstance of cities where approximately all people in the modern time live has negative impact on individuals' relaxed even to think about success. By way of illustration I can refer to my cousin's life as the best example for this case. He used to live in the small village where was so quiet; consequently, he was able to focus on his subjects easily. And now he is one of the best sociologists in the world, while my brother who used to live in the city is not success person like my cousin. Thus, because of stressful conditions of modern time, achieving success in the modern time is more difficult than past.
In brief, as I discussed in the previous paragraphs, some people believe that gaining success in the past was easier than now. I argued that this statement is true for a couple of reasons. First, in the past there were not much development, so gaining success was easier. Second, the stressful conditions of modern time led to reduce individuals' concentration as the most important thing which individuals need to be success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 574, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'restricted'.
Suggestion: restricted
...nt, because in the past development was restrict. So gaining success was not hard like m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... the modern time is more difficult than past time. I agree with this statement, because c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 94.0 52.1666666667 180% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 529.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82419659735 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71859675737 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.366729678639 0.524837075471 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0459943969 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.08 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.16 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259243518834 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995515404829 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781392031047 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193211660933 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293215558887 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.