do you agree or disagree with following statement? leadership comes naturally: one can not learn to be a leader . use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It goes without saying that from ancient times to this contemporary modern era, the firm leadership has played a prominent role in the success of a group or an organization or even a country. In this regard, each society is striving to bring up wise and robust leaders. The controversial question which arises here is whether leadership is intrinsic or could be acquired. Taking the recent studies in this area into account, one can develop leadership skills through fundamental education and practical experiences.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that although charismatic leadership could be a part of some individual’s nature, major and indispensable leadership skills can be learnt through education. To be more specific, when people attend university, they gain knowledge about a wide variety of management subjects in very great details and also they are compelled to participate in the management workshops in which successful managers share talk about their experiences. After accomplishment of a four-year study in university, they become intellectually superior to than anyone else in leadership and are eligible to administer every organization. To put it in a more vivid picture, I read the major newspaper last week. It was mentioned that many experts argue that people who have university enter university and get their degrees in leadership and management majors play a leading role in their long-term professional success. So, without having academic knowledge, no one could make a good leader.
What’s more, even ordinary people could make great leaders providing that they have pragmatic approaches to leaderships and undergo practical experiences. To put it in other words, on- the- job experiences are powerful due to challenges including high pressure, complexity, success, failure, novel and unexpected events even success they present. These experiences make people expand their skills and challenge their abilities, which contributes to becoming great leaders. An example can drive this notion home. My brother has worked as an expert in one of the most prestigious companies in my country, Iran. As he faced several difficulties and success and worked along with wise leaders who handled many critical conditions in that company, he obtained precious experiences and was hired by another organization as a manager who played a significant role to bring about progress and a huge profit.in which he assisted it in making progress and gaining a huge profit. Hence, had my brother not struggled with those challenges, worked in that company to gain practical experience, he would not have gotten the chance to develop his leadership skills.he would not have become a good leader.
In conclusion, having aforementioned reasons and examples into account, one can infer that leadership skills can be acquired and do no’t come naturally. By having a broad management curriculum in university and priceless experiences in work environment anyone is able to make a good leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they gain knowledge about a wide variety of management subjects in very great det...
^^
Line 3, column 862, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a manager who played a significant role to bring about progress and a huge prof...
^^
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anager who played a significant role to bring about progress and a huge profit.i...
^^
Line 3, column 1088, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at company to gain practical experience, he would not have gotten the chance to d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2552.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40677966102 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06022569874 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2216115811 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.315789474 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8421052632 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159557272534 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537652586502 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670294738476 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12223128321 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680520082779 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.