Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Leaders play crucial roles in any society and have high prestige in any community which motivates a lot of people to become leaders. In this vein, whether anyone can become a leader or not is a disputable issue. Although some people believe that leadership comes naturally, I disagree with this outlook. In the following paragraphs, I explain my reasons to clarify my attitude.
First and foremost, hardworking is the most profound factor led to success and learning new skills. "Success is composed of 1 percent talent and 99 percent efforts", the astute character in my favorite book said. Based on this assertion, it is crystal clear that although intrinsic features of people are different, they can reach whatever they want from the bottom of their heart through trying very hard and devoting a considerable portion of their time and effort on it. Being a leader is not an exception of this fact. My father experience is a compelling example. When he was young, he was shamed and could not express his ideas freely. He was afraid of leadership since he thought he did not have any talent in this area. As a result, he was always an employee to follow other's rules. Accidentally, his leader confronted a severe disease and could not continue his job. He selected my father as a candidate. My father forced to accept this suggestion because if he did not accept, the company would fail, and all employees lost their jobs which was unfair. My father tried very hard and became successful in this position.
Moreover, all skills can be acquired through knowledge and experience. Although it is true that the more intrinsic talents people have in a specific field of science, the faster they will become master at it, anyone can learn that field. Nowadays, there are huge amounts of facilities that people can use to gain precious information they want and experience critical situations including universities, Internet, books, to name but a few. Thanks to these developments, anyone can learn to be a leader. A recent research conducted in the best university in my country proved this claim. More than of 90 percent of great leaders did not have any talent in leadership and obtained this skill through their lives.
In conclusion, based on the aforementioned details and examples, I think that everyone can learn to be a leader. This is because not only can people learn what they want through hardworking, but also thanks to existing facilities, people can learn any skill by means of studying and experiencing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 942, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accepting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accepting
...father as a candidate. My father forced to accept this suggestion because if he did not a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, i think, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97176470588 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77315255377 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538823529412 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4140014936 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0416666667 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7083333333 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70833333333 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12377015037 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418721786874 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482222157252 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925276528101 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394338190721 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.