Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Many countries are paying attention to environmental problems. But the attention is not making the environmental situations better.
Environmental problems are causing many global issues plaguing the life of almost everyone. From my perspective, although many countries are well aware of these and have taken measures accordingly, the overall environmental situation is still deteriorating.
First, it is difficult for global governance to reach consistent or equitable consensuses. For issues as far-reaching and intricate as environmental protection, international collaboration is key to ensuring successful implementations of policies that can bring positive outcomes. The reason is that if some countries enforce stringent regulations to conserve nature, but other countries pay no attention to controlling the emission of pollutants, environmental conditions would still deteriorate. Moreover, even if global cooperations are in place to some extent, there are possible dilemmas. For example, some countries might backtrack their environmental policies due to a change in the ruling party, forfeiting the efforts made by their predecessors. Or, assigning responsibilities to countries equally regardless of their economic or population difference might cause unfairness, thus undermining the long-term stability of the consensus reached by member countries. These factors will make environmental management less likely to be persistent in yielding fruitful outcomes.
Second, given the intricate nature of environmental problems, approaches aimed at reducing them can be ineffective. Most of these problems are intertwined, and attempts to tackle them can cause unexpected, or even unnoticed, consequences. For instance, when a government decides to plant some greenery to revert a desolated place into arable land, irrigation will use an excessive amount of water. And this water might be pumped from underground reservoirs in surrounding areas, causing survival pressures on vegetation there. When this goes unnoticed for some time, the ecology of the surrounding areas might become off-balanced. Even if the government can take immediate actions to prevent the situation from becoming out of control, these areas have already suffered from aridity, and their environment might never fully recover. Issues like this make it improbable for environmental governance to have designated effects.
To conclude, environmental situations will worsen because the needed international collaborations are unstable in the long term, and the complexity of environmental issues makes their treatments unlikely to be effective throughout.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08757062147 4.8611393121 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39490321954 2.67179642975 127% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1613493471 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.764705882 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207907518352 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664415279099 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637104237726 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146459887695 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526676784272 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 58.1214874552 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 10.9000537634 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.01818996416 131% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.