Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The more money people have, the more they should give a way to charity.
At the beginning of the new era, an increasing amount of countries improve a lot among lots of fields, such as economy, education, and technology, so as to lead more and more people can gather more opportunities and gradually become wealthy. Under that condition, some people consider that the more money people have, the more they should give a way to charity. From my point of view, I disagree with this statement.
To begin with, contributing tremendous money to charity will slow down the development of country. Unquestionably, if people can always acquire alms and helps from their government and wealthy people yet without working, most people will choose to stay at home and wait for money. Afterward, whole society will lose lots of labors who can work for public facilities or constructing. More than that, people will gradually abandon their goal or dream, since they can stably gain every things from others. Undergoing these cases, this country might badly slow down their pace of advancing and progressing. In the end, when the government or wealthy do not have enough money, a great amount of panics and bad issues will also prevent country’s normal developments on every fields. Therefore, making wealthy people give their money to charity will block the developments of country and public.
In addition, devoting money and funds to wealthy people’s enterprises or business is also a great way to bring great effect to government and public. To some extent, if a country have lots of enterprises and stable native companies, these businesses can always contribute lot of helpful things to whole country, such as employments, advancing high-tech products, and so on. For example, in lots of modern country, such as United States, China, and Japan, these nations’ societies and public always can acquire some supports from their native companies, such as Honda company, which always can provide great quality types of cars and have high popularity around the world. Honda business not only selling lots of cars around the world and gain lots of profits, but also always provide wonderful quality cars to their own public and offer lots of additional employments to society. All the time, Japan’s governments can take the Honda as a symbols of Japan, which gradually let more and more people know the Japan and believes Japan’s made. Therefore, encouraging wealthy people to contribute their money to their own business and acquire successful achievements is better than give money to Charity.
Indeed, donating money to charity can benefit a great number of people. However, it is unreasonable for all of people who just have more money to help others. Most people’s money is gained by hardly working and studying. Hence, these salaries should belong to their private things and how to spend these money is also depended by themselves. In other words, it is unnecessary for everyone to give money to charity.
Therefore, I completely disagree with that the more money people have, they should give a way to the charity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... as economy, education, and technology, so as to lead more and more people can gather mo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 936, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a symbol' or simply 'symbols'?
Suggestion: a symbol; symbols
...pan’s governments can take the Honda as a symbols of Japan, which gradually let more and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...o their private things and how to spend these money is also depended by themselves. In othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 499.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11623246493 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65043678691 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464929859719 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8812512495 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.045454545 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6818181818 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33893953974 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125903928951 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133883242686 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295499457423 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165336990879 0.0645574589148 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.