Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The reading students do on their own is as important as, or even more important than the reading assigned by their teachers.
Reading books is an effective way to help students acquire endless knowledge. For modern educational systems, a majority of groups of students have read some types of books that are assigned by their teachers. Nevertheless, modern public take the fresh view that it is significant for students to choose some books and read. From my point of view, I consider students should still persist to read some books assigning by their teachers.
To begin with, instructors can select more useful books that can help students with their study. As for teachers, a majority of them are very professional, they already have abundant helpful and useful experience to help students select some types of books that can bring some instructive effects to students with their study. For example, most universities’ professors are wiling to arrange some books to students after classes, since they know their students’ condition of studying, such as their weaknesses and strong points. Before assign several books, professors may carefully make lots of choices among different sorts of books and finally give several specific materials to students, which depend on a great number of students’ different foibles and characters. Reading and understanding lots of books that are arranged by their professors, most students will gradually discover some faults and successfully make their best efforts to get some breakthroughs with their weaknesses, and acquire better study results in their future.
In addition, reading several books that arranged by teachers can help students relieve their pressures. For a great amounts of students, they have to deal with tons of assignments, papers, and examinations. Hence, it is difficult for them to divert their mind to other aspects, just like attempting to select some books and read. For a instance, there are lots of high schools students standing up hundreds of papers and examinations in my country. As for them, none want to waste time on selecting books or making faults. When they try to choose some books and read, they might select some unrelated books and make lots of faults. Afterward, if they still concentrate on these wrong materials, they will never acquire any useful knowledge that can help them deal with the heavier school works.Therefore, it is unquestionably waste students lots of time. Compared with that, if high school instructors can arrange special books to students, it can completely solve students’ inconveniences of choosing books. In the end, students will not only relieve their pressure, but also timely successfully accomplish their school works.
Thus, I consider students should read abundant books which assigned by their own teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ting to select some books and read. For a instance, there are lots of high school...
^
Line 3, column 795, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...them deal with the heavier school works.Therefore, it is unquestionably waste students lo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35831381733 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80950222742 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487119437939 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7024989204 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.421052632 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233547046534 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104281303867 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688073232921 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19592757171 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351054472605 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.