Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The issue at hand is whether the advertisement makes products seem much better than they really are or not. Personally speaking, I agree with this statement and think there are some advertisements announced that have over exaggeration of products. I think this way of advertisements has some negative impact on society's beliefs and reliefs. In the following, I will pinpoint some reasons that support my idea.
The first thing that comes to mind the first time that we hear the advertisement's word is the product owners are trying to say lies. Although, it means they believe that their products are better than other same in the market and have a lot of features which made them a perspective choice from other peers, but they sometimes use a number of boring or disadvantage announced to the advert. For example, we have a lot of advertisements for a real state that every single day spends more money to announce between tv programs or music player applications, or even radio podcast sponsors. It sometimes makes people get an uncomfortable feeling about that consultant's insinuation.
The second reason is advertisements companies use celebrities and elites to announce their product. They have a certain attribute of this way: when people see famous people use a certain brand they are willing to buy that and consumed it. By doing so, it guarantees that the rate of selling certain products is increasing and the company gets profits from this way. I think it is unprofessional for celebrities, they are famous and people watch their activities closely so it doesn't appropriate for them to announce ridiculous advertisements with boom gum.
To the short long story, I agree with this statement that Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.
I think if the companies try to do some positive and charity action they can get more consumeres.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 653, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consultants'' or 'consultant's'?
Suggestion: consultants'; consultant's
...get an uncomfortable feeling about that consultants insinuation. The second reason is adve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...le watch their activities closely so it doesnt appropriate for them to announce ridicu...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, second, so, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03205128205 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93955516186 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8961832324 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297566644653 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110320132252 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105648696083 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192922935746 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12636103748 0.0645574589148 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.