Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, most companies rely on advertisement to become successful. They tend to misguide the customers by advertising their products in a very unique way. Personally, I think most products look different on Tv than on reality. I feel this way for couple of reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, companies work very hard to advertise their product differently because they want to attract their customers. People are prone to get attracted when they see the product in unique form. Because most companies know that the eye is the major sense in all human being that determine the product is good or bad, they seem to make the product look perfect on advertisement. For example, Macdonald’s company invested more than billion dollars in order to make their burgers look delicious and attractive to people. So, whenever I sit with my family and watch some political program on TV, we used to have the desire to eat Macdonald’s burger during its commercial break. However, when we go to Macdonald’s store and order the exact burger that we saw on TV, it does not look the same. It looks smaller and less attractive.
In conclusion, I believe that most companies show their product looks better than its really look. I believe it in this way because companies want to attract their product to every costumer around.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...mers by advertising their products in a very unique way. Personally, I think most products ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: LOOK_WATCH[3]
Message: Did you mean 'watch'?
Suggestion: watch
... way. Personally, I think most products look different on Tv than on reality. I feel...
^^^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...onald's company invested more than billion dollars in order to make their burgers ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, really, so, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1977.66487455 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 229.0 407.700716846 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95633187773 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86133850871 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589519650655 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 618.680645161 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1537705908 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3076923077 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184502690139 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717768745161 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488900425695 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136288791989 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177448617341 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.