Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A growing number of companies realize the investment is of importance at the age of full of competition. The problem about figuring out the most significant aspect is worth thinking. Someone suggests that there is no more important investment than improving the employees’ skills. I do not agree with it.
Admittedly, improving the skills of employees is a good way to earn more profit for company. It means employees will have ability to offer better service and finish tasks efficiently after they are well trained. If employees acquire more professional knowledge, they will come up with much more novel and practical ideas; if employees develop communication skills, they will get along well with each other and create a harmonious atmosphere; if employees improve sales capability, they will effort to sell more product. It is obvious that the investment of improving employees’ skills does play an important role in the company.
However, the development of technology is more important than improving the skills of employees. In order to survive in the competitive economic environment, company is supposed to constantly research new products. Comparing with employees, there is no doubt that the technology is more crucial. Consumers are not able to feel whether the employees require more skills or not. They are interested in goods, especially high quality with low price. Though employees have good abilities and can easily achieve their work, they still fail to raise the strong urge from consumers to purchase goods. For a business, the profit above everything else. So, developing technology is more necessary than improving skills of employees.
Furthermore, a better advertising is more important than employees’ skills as well. For example, a food advertising, which looks tasty and people desire to buy and eat it when they watch this advertising, helps company increase sales volume. Or the star who endorsing products is so famous that numerous fans are willing to purchase this commodity. For consumers, fascinating advertising makes them visually learn about the characters and decide whether to buy it or not. As I mentioned, consumers do not concern about the employees in company since it is none of their business. So that a nice adverting tactic benefits more than well-practiced employees.
To put it in a nutshell, although the improvement of employees is useful to some extent, it is not the most important investment. Company should spend the limited time and money on developing technology and advertising.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-21 | syuku | 80 | view |
| 2020-03-17 | zhaodejian | 70 | view |
- Parents give their children weekly money to buy whatever they want Some people think this can cause bad habits and ideas about money in children Others think the opposite What s your opinion 91
- Parents should set strict rules to their children if they want them to succeed in the future 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing sports can teach people lessons about the life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To be successful a business must put more money into advertising 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should spend money helping more people access the Internet insteadof improving public transportation 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 581, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...any since it is none of their business. So that a nice adverting tactic benefits more t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, well, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34987593052 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9794411591 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8456098564 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8333333333 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7916666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239557092096 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813408470046 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764149741435 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158945500166 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641800473892 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.