Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Music and literature are more important for students than math and science.
Albeit a vast majority of people nowadays proclaim that subjects akin to literature and music are more pivotal than math and science, there are still some people who utterly refute this statement by accentuating that, in fact, math and science are the most significant subjects. From my point of view, math and science are more vital than literature, not to mention music, and I uphold this opinion for three core reasons, which I will elucidate in the following essay in depth.
First and foremost, according to the research conducted by prominent scientists, it became evident that a tremendous portion of students are inclined to major in subjects alike math and science rather than music and literature. Thus, studying math and science is more effective and crucial. Additionally, studying math not only is supportive in terms of majoring in particular field, but it also enables students to adept at most of other subjects. For instance, excelling at math helps you to learn and perceive subjects such as physics, biology, chemistry, geology, and IT in a much easier way for these subjects entail a myriad of content related to math. To this end, math is also exceedingly important for comprehending other subjects.
Secondly, 21st century is a century of technology, which means that everything currently is based on technology, so everyone has to have some information regarding how to utilize technological devices and everyone should keep up with technology, otherwise it is arduous to to find a job. And in order to use technological devices you have to have broad knowledge in math since integral part of technology is math. As the time passes, technology advances, so the need for people who are qualified in technology is increasing dramatically. Music and literature are not as substantial as math and science because the need for either music or literature is not much and these subjects are not much promising.
In conclusion, I would like to assert that we need math and science since they not only help us to find decent occupation, but they also help us to overcome a plethora of problems, which we encounter throughout our lives. Consequently, math and science are more fundamental than anything, and we have to encourage students to focus on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idate in the following essay in depth. First and foremost, according to the res...
^^
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and crucial. Additionally, studying math not only is supportive in terms of major...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ith technology, otherwise it is arduous to to find a job. And in order to use technol...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...you have to have broad knowledge in math since integral part of technology is mat...
^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...ed math and science since they not only help us to find decent occupation, but they also help u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.064 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88597405086 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.938451087 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.076923077 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8461538462 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 5.45110844103 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317076872361 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113004489629 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619234603178 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179570530587 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677898427193 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.