Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples

Throughout life, there are numerous decisive tasks that increase someone's satisfaction with their lives, and people have to choose their desire task based on their personality. One of these activities is helping strangers, and the breadth of this humanism has called into question recently. Some people believe that it can be seen people's inclination towards helping others has increased, which is appreciable, while others are of the opinion that, in the past, people were more sympathetic and caring. Although nowadays most of the people have a hectic daily schedule, it is my firm conviction that they allocate an acceptable amount of their time to charities in comparison to the past. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, technology brought about convenience with new devices which have been made to meet people's needs conspicuously, meanwhile it has provided a situation in which informs people about what is going around them. In other words, technology makes people aware of their surroundings. As a result, they will find places where are under the standards of living without exaggeration. Take my personal experience as a compelling example, a couple of years ago, I was on my vacation in one of the breathtaking villages of my country, where the ambiance and nature were noticeably vibrant. Of a sudden, I encountered some villagers with a heavy burden on their back and unsuitable clothes and shoes in that weather. So they invited me to their houses, although you could not call them 'houses' because they did not have basic amenities such as lights, water piping, clothes, and food. The idea popped into my mind, and I decided to take some photos of their intolerable situation. It is unbelievable that, as soon as I shared the photos on my Instagram, numerous comments have been received. Most of my friends were volunteered to gathered appropriate clothes, food for them and distribute them among villagers.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that in the modern era's people not only seek worldly pleasure but also try to fulfill themselves by doing moral duties. Helping others is one of the prominent factors which provide assistance to satisfy our desire. When people thirst for a new-released car as soon as they get it, they will forget about its value. On the other hand, helping others and donating money to charities is of great importance that never will lose their usefulness.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that people's tendency towards helping others has increased. The fact that technology has decreased obliviousness among people, coupled with the need of humans to satisfy themselves, is the reason which strengthens my claim.

Average: 7.7 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'lose'.
Suggestion: will never lose
...o charities is of great importance that never will lose their usefulness. In summary of what h...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, while, in summary, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10799136069 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77905564337 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557235421166 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4590611956 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.15 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284228306144 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773079944105 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565698307079 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170216393882 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393776657369 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.