Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One of the characteristics of successful leaders is a sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes.
Leadership, as we all know, is the few people characteristic. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, one may find the leader's features sensible. In this regard, many people support this opinion that one of the characteristics of successful leaders is the ability to accept their mistakes. I believe that accepting mistakes is a trait that distinguishes a leader from others. Moreover, it will improve creativity. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold this belief that being responsible for mistakes is a critical feature is goals. Undoubtedly, mistakes are inevitable; but people who can accept their fault and compensate it are few that leaders are included in. Based on an experiment, results showed that people born with some characteristics which assign them as a leader in the future. They claim that traits like handling the hard situation, positively influencing other people, and guide people to the specific purposes are determined as leadership. Likewise, they suggest that among the leader's features, there is a key element that plays a significant role in the leader to act successfully. It is the responsibility of faults. Therefore, at least, for the aim of the group a leader should accept his mistakes.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is creativity. Without a doubt, creativity is a crucial factor inside a group and can increase efficiency. For instance, when an unfavorable event be in a group, what would have happened if employees had charged because of others' fault? They will lose their trust and creativity, as well. The unwanted situation compelled them to adverse circumstances. In fact, it is the critical task for a leader in teaching that everybody is responsible for his own mistake, even the boss or the leader. Likewise, subordinates will understand there are rules and can have confidence in the system. Therefore, they start to risk and show creative ideas that will lead the group to a better position. Thus, leaders, through accepting the mistakes, dictate that it is a fair situation for everybody.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that admitting the responsibility of mistakes not only is a critical feature for leaders but also it is a crucial factor of success. So it is far better for a leader to be responsible for his own mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...an accept their fault and compensate it are few that leaders are included in. Base...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18020304569 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06889317774 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9384726451 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0416666667 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278311151601 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735117335506 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747587881486 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183222189832 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356368803085 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.