Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the dawn of social medias over the world, some persons get fames and be well-known. Follow them, ordinary people begin to imitate their lifestyle wish to get fames one day. The question here is whether the affect of celebrities on older people is as same as the youngers? There may seem to be controversy at first glance; However, I significantly concur that the well-known influences on the youngs is more obviously. I have some compelling reasons mentioned in the following paragraphs.
First, older people do not use social medias like yonger do. The most of them grow in the situation where is not any electeronic vessels. They never involve in internet actions in their life such youngers which most of them can continue their life without their phones. The olders exploit from phones for some rudimentory task like calling to their children, giving massages from their peer, or doing some of their administrative works. Most of the aged people can't undrestand very simple phone's performance.
Second, the olders did their life. They haven't eager to follow celebrities to know their life. On the other hand, young people have incredible enthusiam to learn how to live. For example, I follow some celebrities in social media that they work on civil engineering as a young people. The paramost goal of me is learn to how I should perform in continue of my life to be prosperous. They are living in my ideal future so I can get some information and imagine
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...strative works. Most of the aged people cant undrestand very simple phones performan...
^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...Second, the olders did their life. They havent eager to follow celebrities to know the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...oung people. The paramost goal of me is learn to how I should perform in continue of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 250.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.884 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63630347267 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.853783553 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3125 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179084085051 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066025114523 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577413475409 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122907011899 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00986979581971 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.