Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.

There is no denying the fact that, previous generation's way of life will have a significant impact on future generations. I agree with the statement presented in the prompt that, our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations. I will provide two reasons to support the statement.

To begin, we, present generation, are polluting the earth so much that it may not be suitable to live for our future generations. We are polluting air, water, sound - all our environment. We are cutting down trees for housing, that results in the decrease of oxygen in air, whereas, as population is increasing rapidly, the amount of carbon dioxide is increasing rapidly. So earth's atmosphere is getting warmer due to green house effect, which results to global warming. Because of global warming, ice may melt in the poles of earth which lead to the increase in sea water level. This may cause a lot of countries to be submerged in water. Furthermore, as we are also polluting water in the rivers as well as seas, marine creatures are in danger, which will hamper our ecosystem. Uncontrolled use of plastics are causing to deaths of fishes in the river and seas. So, by polluting environments, we are making the earth less livable for our future generation.

On top of that, the exponential increase in technologies will be harmful for future generation. Social media, like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok etc. are a distraction for the students as they spend their valuable time in this rather than studying. One may argue that these modern technologies are enhacing the way of our living, but they fail to notice that these technologies are harming our normal way of life. In addition to waste of time, there are less interactions between people as they are spending more time on their smartphones scrolling facebook or playing video games rather than going to park and spend healthy time with family members. Many psychological problems like loss of concentration, depression, suicidal tendencies etc. are increasing because people become obsessed about others life by watching their success in the social media. In social media, everyone tries to show that they are perfect, leading to envy and depressions among others. So, this uncontrolled use of social media and video games are harmful for our younger generation. As more and more technolgies are coming, our future generation is in a dark situation.

To sump up, I think that our modern way of life will hamper the future generation. As we are polluting environment indiscriminantly and not caring about the adverse effect of emerging technologies in our children's life, our children's generation are certainly in uncertain and bad situation.

Votes

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun interactions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...In addition to waste of time, there are less interactions between people as they are...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, whereas, i think, in addition, as well as, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07382550336 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87594261389 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507829977629 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.025958859 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280976105403 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835459211401 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126992903096 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228067729102 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180015165315 0.0645574589148 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.