Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is an undeniable fact that the importance of parenting cannot be neglected in any era. The world is today now is not the same as the world were in 50 years earlier. Some people say the parents of today are engaged with their children's education more than the parents were in the past. As far as my opinion is concerned, the parents of today are busier than the parents were in the past, they are not involved that much in their children's education than the parents were engaged in the past.
To start with, as compared to the past, first I would say parents today have much pressure to tackle many aspects of their family. The parents of today's world have to juggle between multiple jobs both of the spouses are doing a job. Before 50 years I would say, The financial status was differents not that much competition the life was simple. Mostly, one of the spouses worked to run the finance of the family and it ran smoothly but now both have to work. So, one of the spouses handles all the family matters like involved in the children's education. Mostly, the mother handles the school matters and involved with children's education. The studies were not that complicated to teach everything was simple to comprehend and easy to teach. Indeed the parents of the past more involved than the parents of today.
On the other hand, the parents of today have to deal with not only the jobs, household chores, and education but have to teach many aspects like different skills to teach, involved children in physical, mental well-being activities. Moreover, the fast pace technology helped children in their education like there are cellular applications available that can teach from basic to advance level education. As a result, the parents of today do not need to be involved to teach basic education. One more point is that now the homework is not manually done, it can be submitted through the email or online school site, do not need to force children to complete their homework. Parents of today have many options to use to teach them than personally involved by themselves to teach them. There are online tutoring available for children if they need any help. The parents of today are not involved personally to teach their children but using other technological advancements to teach their children and can be involved in other areas of children’s upbringing.
In the end, I would say there is no comparison between the parents of today or parents of the past, who involved more in the children's education. They both involved but in different ways because the era is changed. Parents of past involved manually in children’s education and parents of today involved with the help of technological gadgets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...simple to comprehend and easy to teach. Indeed the parents of the past more involved t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to teach, involved children in physical, mental well-being activities. Moreover, ...
^^
Line 5, column 712, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
.... Parents of today have many options to use to teach them than personally involved ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, well, as a result, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81623931624 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54761436609 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.391025641026 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6524205922 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.454545455 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68181818182 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418259510647 0.236089414692 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157060337697 0.076458572812 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13643642109 0.0737576698707 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317253951881 0.150856017488 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078518459416 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.