Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were in the past.
With the passage of time, the world in which we live has experienced a galloping rate of development and progress in technology as well as science. With this in mind, educations become extremely vital for any individual in the current and future world to be successful. It stands to reason that parents are a key factor in children’s education because they are able to have either beneficial or detrimental effects on their children by appropriate or misleading guides. I flatly subscribe to the idea that parents are more engaged in their children’s education nowadays than were in the past.
First and foremost, the significance of education, which is not obscured to everyone, specifically to parents, increases constantly in the present-day world. Any perceptive person can realize and witness the benefits of a proper level of education, including high-wage jobs, high social status, and a desirable lifestyle. For instance, the more educated is a person, the more money he or she earns, and the more affluent they lead a life. For this reason, parents are more concerned about their children’s education and engage themselves in their education. Any individual can observe this fact from quite a bit of conspicuous existing evidence, one of which is an increase in connection between children’s parents and their teachers. Parents always ask teachers of their children questions about their children’s education status in order to monitor them and help them if it is necessary. Similarly, teachers and schools are more worried about children’s education status, ask parents to more notice them, and usually send monthly reports to parents so as to nurture useful persons who can benefit society sometime during the future. Therefore, it seems ineluctable for parents to be more involved in the education of their offsprings.
Another fact is that as time passed, the education of parents became higher, while a great majority of parents in the past are illiterate. Hence, it is crystal clear that the more educated are parents, the more they understand the significance of education, and the more they are involved in their children’s education. Moreover, as they are more learned, they can help their children with their lessons. In the past, conversely, parents did not have enough knowledge to help children and neglected their offsprings’ education.
To summarize, by taking the abovementioned reasons into account, I concur with the idea that today’s parents are more engaged in their children’s education in light of the fact that they more realize the importance of education and that today’s relationship between parents and teachers is enhanced. With bearing this in mind, we can imagine a more advanced world in the future.
- A gift can contribute to child s development What gift would you give to help a child development 76
- TPO 42 80
- TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were in the past 73
- Some people prefer to live in the country Others prefer to live in the town or big cities which do you prefer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1052, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...usually send monthly reports to parents so as to nurture useful persons who can benefit ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29772727273 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94372055441 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468181818182 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8501043811 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391489793171 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148588682207 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946650195327 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278809260252 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175107150898 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.