Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what kind of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Having a decent job or career is a crucial need for every one and nowadays people try to find a job which can build up their future as good as possible. It is an arguable issue that what kind of work can make a brilliant future for job seekers. Some people claim that in the modern society it would be difficult for people to recognizing what kind of profession can be suitable to them. But, others as I do, have opposite view. I think there are a variety of ways which can lead people to achieve a career that makes their future as well as possible. I think this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, there are some facilities which can benefit people to get information about today's career, and these means people can make a wisely decision about their future work. Thanks to the technology people can gain a lot of data about every topics especially some important issues like the jobs they want to apply for. For example, the Internet has given people access to information on a level never experience before. Job seekers can connect to the Internet and search about their favorite jobs as easy as pie. They also not only can access to a wide variety of choices or eclectic jobs but also can get information about different aspects of the job. In addition, they can use others' experience and get a far deeper understanding about that profession. In the past, people never access to such technology for sharing information nor have such jobs variety.
Secondly, the differences of jobs and innovations in new era are causing people to have a range of choices, and it gives them a unique opportunities to make easy the road of their dream. The diversity of career give the chance to people that find their interested job. And because of this people can satisfy with their job. For instance, I, as a Robotics engineer, have always dreamt about my future work. I have always imagined myself as an engineer in a prosperous industry. Virtually, these days I have some alternatives about my job which never is not available before. By the innovation of robotics on its improvement on industries, I get a chance to find my desirable profession and put into practice my knowledge at the service of the company. It not only have caused me to get the mental satisfaction I need but also have leaded me a secure profession.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that these day people can find prosperous jobs more than ever before. This is because in modern era there are a plethora of facilities which can help people to find their jobs and because there are an enormous number of jobs which are available.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('wisely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decision') instead of another adjective.
...career, and these means people can make a wisely decision about their future work. Thanks to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opportunity'?
Suggestion: opportunity
... of choices, and it gives them a unique opportunities to make easy the road of their dream. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nd their interested job. And because of this people can satisfy with their job. For ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62632696391 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57050016859 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447983014862 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1630420074 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7391304348 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4782608696 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13043478261 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103086733015 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391039097373 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251434208456 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707255809433 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311684229165 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.