The issue here is whether people communicate with each other less or more than the past because of the popularity of television. In my opinion, I believe that population of television encourages people to communicate better than the past. My view can be greatly substantiated by the reasons addressed below.
To begin with, popularity of television unites people of distant places into an one community. Before the invention of television, people living in rural areas were often abandoned by urban places, and local community was more powerful in rural areas. Local communities were more influential to individuals, and made a small circle of community. However, nowadays, television programs are broadcasted ubiquotously, and gives the same message and issues to different places. Television enabled people to expand their circle of communication. So, people of same nation could share similar indirect experience from television, and the power of nation became powerful.
Second of all, television programs facilitated communication by serving as a place for debate. Some might say television is an one-sided media since broadcast system propagate their program and viewers watch it. However, viewers actually partipate on television programs and interact with each other by this media. For instance, the public are the audiences of debate programs, public participate on news interviews and actively voice out their thoughts. These interactive television program enables public a space where they can act out and communicate. In other words, television programs act as an agora.
Last but not least, people reproduce culture out of television programs. Recently, televisions convey people the newest, cutting-edge global trends to their viewers. People not only absorb the propaganda from the television program but communicate make their own culture from it. For example, when I was in high school, audition program called Korean's got talent was a big hit in my highschool. We not only watched it with biggest fanship, but also imitated the songs from the program, and changed the lyrics and choreographies and made our own musical out of it. This example shows that people not only view but also actively communicate and invent new cultures from the television.
In conclusion, I personally think that popularity of television does not hinder people from communicating. On the contrary, television facilitates communication of the viewers by connecting people regardless of where they live, serving as a space for debate, and by giving people rich resources for new cultural production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on unites people of distant places into an one community. Before the invention of ...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...or debate. Some might say television is an one-sided media since broadcast system ...
^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rograms and interact with each other by this media. For instance, the public are the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5125 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97392732763 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0525395557 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8695652174 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3913043478 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244072831419 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806891831331 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085034121126 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160336495669 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102418384456 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.