Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People learn better from their classmates or rather than their professors.
Learning has always been a big concern of human being throughout history in which different people prefer different methods of learning. In this connection, Opinions are divided into whether it is more sensible to learn from our peers or co-workers or those individuals that are at higher levels than us. Personally, it is my firm conviction that social members of high levels are the better to learn from. Stating in the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my standpoint through two conspicuous reasons.
the first worthwhile mentioning reason to campion my stance is that supervisors are expert in materials that barely our classmates even know regarding them, as a result, their pieces of advice will more practical. My own experience of writing my paper about blue-green infrastructures is an apt illustration of this claim. Two years before now, I was a senior student that has to submit an article of my thesis to be allowed to defend my master's degree. At first, I consulted with my roommate who was my classmate as well in order to learn an evaluation method of blue-green infrastructures using in my paper but he had no idea what is BGI let alone A its venue of evaluation. Consequently, I turned to my supervisor that helped me out immediately since the subject was utterly common for him. Under no circumstances did I be able to submit my paper if my supervisor did not teach me that method.
The second noteworthy point to endorse my outlook is that teachers have been armed with various methods of teaching due to their valuable experience of teaching for many years. My personal experience of memorizing the botanical name of plants is a compelling example of this. being a student in the university studying the bachelor of landscape design. I had to memorize a wast number of plants' names. One of my classmates was good at it; even though he helped me several times, I made no progress. In contrast, My professor taught me how to create a flashcard for each plant then I will be able to review them everywhere and at any time such as commuting to university. Therefore, it can be inferred simply that teachers are a better choice for learning rather than our peers.
To wrap up what has been discussed, I profoundly believe that people of higher levels are more suitable to learn from. This is because not only are professors familiar with our aims of studying but also their experience f teaching is a decisive factor that our peers do not have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...int through two conspicuous reasons. the first worthwhile mentioning reason to c...
^^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'A' or 'its'?
Suggestion: A; Its
...ut he had no idea what is BGI let alone A its venue of evaluation. Consequently, I tu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Being
...plants is a compelling example of this. being a student in the university studying th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80327868852 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85906949285 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1296879989 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.947368421 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4736842105 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163470872538 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501770849552 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495664921431 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121444772643 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530958337485 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.