Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People learn things better from those at their own level –such as fellow students or co-workers – than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In all societies and specifically modernized ones, taking some advisements from other people in various subjects has always been among concerns and problems of human beings' lives. Today, it is axiomatic that people spend a large of their lives involving with community. A plethora of people hold conviction that humans may learn more from others who are in the same level as them, whereas others might hold exactly the opposite view. I firmly endorse the idea that it is more possible to learn from the higher level individuals because of their experience and an old habit of human beings. In what follows, this essay is going to aptly delve into the most outstanding reasons to advocate my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned here is about the fact that the higher level persons actually have proven experience and in most of the time much knowledge than the other levels. Indeed, these individuals have worked and studied for long time, therefore they know all aspects of the subjects and have many solved problems which might help other people in their career. The more time elapses for working in one issue, the more recognition of the suitable solutions. In my own experience, before one of my final exams of university's lesson, I asked some problems from one of my friends who his knowledge was as well as me. At last, I wrote his thought in my exam paper and lost the point, because he did not pay attention to the tricks of that issue. Had I asked it form the professor I would have had the better score in that exam.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that humans used to listen and follows the older people from first of their lives. Moreover, most people have always had the conviction that the higher level persons know more than the other because of their position. On the other hand, in the childhood of every individual, they have been taught that obey the elders and teacher. Therefore, this fact leads to learning more from the higher level people such as teacher and supervisors. For example, children listen to their parents because they are elder and believe in them.
To put it briefly, all enumerated reasons lead us to the conclusion that not only people pay more attention the high-level persons, but also they learn more objects from them. However, a paramount issue that must be mentioned is that this cannot be used as a prescription for everybody and some counter examples might exist, which are not mentioned. It is advisable to conduct some statistical surveys and studies to answer this question precisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 775, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'forms'?
Suggestion: forms
...he tricks of that issue. Had I asked it form the professor I would have had the bett...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, briefly, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84459459459 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44499072981 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502252252252 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7983735064 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.210526316 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3684210526 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223745802853 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070812050827 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710258112489 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141130952319 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057095917374 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.