People who have original ideas are of greater value to society than people who are simply able to copy the ideas of others well. To some extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Evaluating a society are not achieved only by having many more scholars or genius individually. It is obvious that this assessment is invalid in order to not pay attention to what a thriving society requires being successful. Indeed, separating people by merely intelligence or innovation is not fair enough, because a successful society has developed in different aspects which are a necessity for progression.
To begin with, the milestone of a flourish civilization is to be united in which arises the sense of patriotism and nationalism that render union effort to develop a country in various aspects such as cultures, economy and sciences. Having a prospering country, it is an essential to have different positions for instance, doctors, scientists, workers, artists and experts and distinct types of people qualifications. In total, although success is arisen by a united strives of variety of all walks of life, the presence of genius and creative individuals is undeniable for the sake of progression of countries in different areas. They are capable of finding new solutions for issues and pave the way for humans’ life. On the other hand, it does not say that the other repeated tasks like some copied art works or some continued tests which belong to provide laboratory experiment are not valued enough. Every new work is important itself, so it shows that the presence of every activity has value for society.
Obviously, in more cases, by doing and continuing a repeated work which is followed the old work, a society can approach their goals. Moreover, it is more important that the education system should not urge their students to become a certain person or a role model. It can cause a dire casualty on their personal character.
In conclusion, undoubtedly, the presence of scholars and innovations are an asset for every country. It does not translate that ordinary people are not suitable. With the developing population, there is an excessive need for having experts in different areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for having experts in different areas.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19817073171 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92283772537 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57012195122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4796680206 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126486249944 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412931666135 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376467584831 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739211858718 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030430741272 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.