With the prosperity of the free trade market nowadays, some people pursue purchasing exotic products in various countries. However, some people insist on buying merchandise from their own countries. As for me, I disagree that people should purchase products from their country. That is, people should consume everything they want without any constraint on local buying.
First of all, people can purchase various exotic things without any limitations. It is an example of my friend, Peter, who bought his necessities in the foreign store, Jason market. At Jason’s, Peter always bought kiwis from New Zealand, red wines from France, and other food and drinks made from different countries. Moreover, by purchasing exotic food freely, he even had an opportunity to try the Blin pancake, a traditional snack in Russia. Therefore, consuming without any local buying limitations really allowed Peter to try more dishes and food made in foreign countries.
Secondly, people can easily consume at a bargain price with no rules for buying local-made products. For instance, as a resident of a freetrade island, I could purchase clothes and shoes without any buying restrictions. Compared to 1000 USD of made-in-Taiwan suits, I always chose to buy suits from China, which cost only 100 USD. Additionally, when I needed a closet, I ordered a British closet which was 30 USD cheaper than the closet made in Taiwan. Consequently, it was really economical for me to buy in such a free trade market.
In contrast, the restriction on making people buy local merchandise may sometimes cause serious monopoly problems. With this restriction, some product prices may soar since the number of people’s needs outweighs the number of products. For example, when the Taiwanese government forced Taiwanese people to buy made-in-Taiwan masks during the COVID-19 pandemic, each mask cost from 1 USD to 30 USD due to large people’s needs. Furthermore, some merchants even monopolize the mask market, setting an exorbitant price for the mask. Hence, the buy-local policy brought nothing but price chaos to the mask markets.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that people do not need to purchase products made in their own countries. After all, with no limit on local-buying, not only can people enjoy various products from different cultures but they can also consume them at a bargain price.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, after all, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27748691099 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80879683428 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552356020942 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9852568896 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1904761905 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252981031228 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855073614714 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765152877533 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162456973739 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814377083128 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.