Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should read only those books that are about real events, real people, and established facts. Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion.
In today’s world Books are the main life-helpers with which we strengthen our knowledge. The past centuries ago, when life was not that much advanced, people used to see joy and euphoria in reading any kind of books they had at home. To my mind, I totally disagree with the above mentioned statement for several reasons.
To start with, books which are not based on the real events are called fictional books, which really are the main roots of child’s mental development and growth. For instance, reading fairytales to our little friends really help them to enlarge their visions, Moreover they tempt to create characters in their mind given in the book, and see them in their own imaginary life. Furthermore, according to my own experiences, since there are many children surrounding me, they really enjoy reading tales, while on the other hand, they adore the characters and they aspire to know more about them which are expressed in wanting to watch tv series according to those books, which then make them feel surprised of how they exactly / differently draw those characters in their imaginary mind.
Secondly, there is no accounting for taste, since adults really enjoy reading fictional books. For instance, I can not think of a person who has never read the most fictional book called “Harry potter”, the tale of a young boy, living in a world with full of wizards and muggles, which are on the one hand fantasy, but on the other hand the book is considered to be a masterpiece. So, the imaginary books are now competing with each for the honour of the world’s great fictional books, that is why I think that fictional books are not less demanded and wanted than non-fictional ones.
On a final note, everything comes from an experience, which is why I think that everyone has ever read the fictional books in childhood times, even in the maturity. And from my point of view, the feeling of love toward books really comes from the roots which I explain it as books from remained from the childhood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge. The past centuries ago, when life was not that much advanced, people used...
^^
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., when life was not that much advanced, people used to see joy and euphoria in r...
^^
Line 8, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d wanted than non-fictional ones. On a final note, everything comes from an e...
^^
Line 8, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I explain it as books from remained from the childhood.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, i think, kind of, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83045977011 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52470165348 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.6537681884 48.9658058833 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.818181818 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6363636364 20.6045352989 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 5.45110844103 232% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141145811338 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603911056749 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296168701736 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876795403566 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038511668482 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.