Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in today’s world have become too dependent on automobiles. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Road vehicles have been a significant portion of the people’s life during the last few years. Personally, I believe that human-being can live independently of cars although it can provide further opportunities. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, in today’s societies, there are myriads of people who do not have automobiles for a number of reasons. However, some of them are successfully keeping up with others who possess vehicle. This is because workers who live close to the office, or individuals who comprehend the health benefit of walking do not need cars. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I have been living in the downtown of my native country’s capital, which signifies that every necessary thing is accessible to my apartment since I was young. To be more specific, my accommodation is adjacent to library, theater and university, thus I can reach these location by only walking but not using public or private transportation. Moreover, I am sure that individuals who live in the reachable position of city can solve the problem of going to other places by ambling. Drawing from my own experience, people from the place to which every other essential factor including stores, the working place, and school can live by not using the vehicles.
Secondly, the road vehicles may be the most common but not the only one type of transportation, which means people can utilize other vehicles or devices. There is a ton of people who ride bicycle to their job or school without using the automobile. Moreover, virtually a third of the Mongolian population is herders who only ride horses. Nonetheless, the fact that these people do not employ cars does not interfere with their life. Furthermore, they are even more healthy than others who drives a car thanks to physical movement and less depression associated with the traffic jam. For this reason, I believe that people can continue their life without any significant loss with or without vehicle with engine.
In summation, individuals are not heavily depended on the road vehicles, and can live without this technology. This is because some people are near to other places, and there are other types of vehicles such as bicycle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, in today’s societies, the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this location' or 'these locations'?
Suggestion: this location; these locations
...heater and university, thus I can reach these location by only walking but not using public or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 713, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss with or without vehicle with engine. In summation, individuals are not heavil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, third, thus, i feel, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03403141361 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83904958942 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6045728656 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.210526316 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132001984105 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460037795826 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050742924381 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742526566359 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035033071039 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.