Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People can absorb knowledge from printed materials or information on the internet both of which have distinct features and several pros and cons. I believe that perusing books and handouts can be effective way of studying. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, individuals will not be exposed to blue-light of devices, so they will not face eyes issue. Electronic devices emits blue-light although their users set brightness at the lowest rate. Hence, the light can impede people's ability to see things clearly. On the other hand, printed materials do not produce any light which can be harmful for people's eyes. It is critically important thing for me who spend a lot of time by learning. If I keep looking at my laptop, I will probably reduce my skill of watching stuff accurately. Long story short, we can ensure our satisfactory eyesight by limiting the amount of time we look at screens of various technologies.
Secondly, books and other paper materials tend to be reliable, which signifies readers can find dependable data. Professional authors usually write articles in printed materials, so they will include true information in passages they write. Therefore, people can avoid any false explanations about matters. For instance, last semester, I was doing research to meet the class requirement of my history course. I searched information about events in the past from the worldwide web. When I hand in my homework, my teacher berated me for writing false things on my research paper, and advised me to seek data from exclusively from books. If I had perused books to study for my class, I would have found dependable information. This example demonstrates how unreliable articles on the internet can be.
Finally, books provide in-depth explanations about concepts, which means readers can have deep understanding about topics. Writers of printed materials explain the meaning of books comprehensively by providing some examples and further interpretations. Then, people can comprehend stuff in books completely. For example, last year, I was going to study theories of calculus. I checked out all popular websites to learn ideas behind this branch of mathematics. Unfortunately, I was still unable to solve formal mathematics problems using theories that I gained from the internet because data on the virtual network was superficial. Nonetheless, I found useful book about calculus, and started reading it. I understood things very well because the explanations in the book was broad and straightforward. Consequently, I satiated my willingness to understand the concept thanks to the book.
In summation, in my opinion, utilizing materials that are written on paper has three main benefits. Our eyes will not be subject to harm caused by the intense lightning of devices. Additionally, people can have correct data and broad comprehension about concepts included in books.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, hence, if, look, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2505.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28481012658 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98559285739 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571729957806 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7893064965 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.5 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23333333333 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855903295745 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226855858862 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258814156456 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0473481211351 0.150856017488 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103171205123 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.