Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who develop many skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only
I believe that people who are equipped with diverse skills will get higher achievements than those who only have only one specific expertise. I feel this way for the following reasons, which I will explore in the following reasons,
The first exquisite reason for the above-stated notion is that people who garner more than one ability on their own can be more competent in the competitive society nowadays. This is because we need to encompass much expertise to convince our boss or human resource manager that we are capable enough to handle the project enough. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was an intern in a marketing department in an international company, I was assigned to a small project to boost up the sales figure of the company’s merchandise. To make the project presented, I first had to do some marketing surveys to check out the preference of the product or whether there are any potential drawbacks that clients feel. After collecting the data from the subjects, I have to use different software to present the information collected such as Excel and Tableau to make the presented project more visualized and clear when the boss started to analyze the report. Finally, I should also learn how to make a public presentation persuasive and try to avoid being nervous in front of many experienced colleagues.
Another conspicuous ground to be mentioned is that people who focus on one skill only will not be willing to make any innovation or improvement but to stick to the old fashion, leading to the possibility of being submerged by the trend. An example can drive this home. My father’s friend used to be a well-known carpenter in our hometown. He is famous for carving the artifacts that the clients desired because the stripe and the visual representation is vivid and gorgeous when he finished the carving. However, most employers hope that hired carpenters could not only be good at carving but also know how to select the woods and shape the figure of the wood furniture. Also, most employers gradually use lazar as a much more cost-effective method to satisfy the clients’ needs when it comes to carving. Even though my father’s friend’s expertise is still excellent, he gradually got a little workload and earn less before because the only skill he encompassed is not enough to catch up with the trend.
In conclusion, it is highly recommended that people nowadays need to have much more skills to be competitive in the world. This is because having more than one ability can help you be more acclaimed and accepted and avoid being eliminated from the trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I believe that people who are equipped w...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will explore in the following reasons, The first exquisite reason for the above...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... front of many experienced colleagues. Another conspicuous ground to be mention...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not enough to catch up with the trend. In conclusion, it is highly recommended ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, still, well, i feel, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88565022422 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79482033991 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52466367713 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0393892068 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.176470588 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2352941176 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245298959639 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699579116419 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970961122717 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176329237321 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818451644226 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.