Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
It is generally agreed that in this modern world with its galloping progress, without having skill, even surviving is too hard. Due to its important characteristic, there is a long discussion among people about whether they should learn many skills or just concentrate to develop one. Some people are inclined toward this attitude that knowing many fields helps them in their life, whereas others emphasize developing one skill. Although it is hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I, myself, do believe that going deep into one skill can be more efficient, because, it makes people more experts in that field, helps them to find a better job, and with high payment.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons coming to my mind first is that concentrating on one skill makes us super experts in it. It is like a deep lake that its depth shows the knowledge that we have on the subject. On the other hand, focusing on many skills is like a vast shallow sea. Needless to say that having deep information about something makes us a reference person, a master key in that field and people always refer to us to solve their problems. I remember, when I was a bachelor's student, I got the best mark in mathematics among students which was the result of spending time on it. Other students always asked me about any problem in that course in the next semester. They thought that I am the best and respected me in this regard.
Another significant reason is that being an expert in one major helps you to find a better job. It is crystal clear that being a super expert in one field can help you to be the best one in that field. To shed more light on this issue, in our today’s competitive world, being an expert can help us to pass any job interview successfully by presenting our information. Simply state, having a shallow knowledge can not help us, because, one time the expert person who asks us question find out that we do not have deep information about the job.
Last but not least, needless to say, that salary is one of the most essential factors that define the quality of a job. We always try to find a job with well pay to not only afford this expensive life but also to make a convenient one. When you are super expert in one skill, it means that you can be a bottleneck for that work, therefore, you can ask for more money to do it. In short, being a skillful person increases the value of work by increasing the payment. There is a famous proverb that says, '' pay more obtain more''. This proverb tells to the managers if they want good work with high quality they should spend more money to hire expert people.
All in all, although there are some exceptions to the general rule, I endorse the idea that is better to concentrate on one skill instead of many skills. It helps us to find a good job with high pay by being the best in that field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bachelors'' or 'bachelor's'?
Suggestion: bachelors'; bachelor's
...heir problems. I remember, when I was a bachelors student, I got the best mark in mathema...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt. There is a famous proverb that says, pay more obtain more. This proverb tells...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 75.0 43.0788530466 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2346.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46857142857 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39164532215 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462857142857 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4058169138 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8260869565 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4347826087 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262558996371 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763470164107 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590734316814 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149753728104 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757398781739 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.