Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill than people who learned it easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The only person who understands the complexity of the task and all difficulties associated with it can be a good teacher. Personally, I believe that it is better to get knowledge from the teachers who have experienced trouble studying a certain skill. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, for me it is obvious that they dedicated more time and learned all details about the subject. As a result, they, using their own experience, can provide you with a plan of what to do and, moreover, what do not to do. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of it. When I was at school, I attended karate classes. And my first coach was really gifted person. His innate features let him get first place at the country championship. Unfortunately, he could not explain many martial arts technics. He just said to us that we should feel these movements and trust ourselves. And only when classes were held by a co-coach, a general man without any natural features, we were provided with detailed information on how to boost our skills. I definitely think that this co-coach gave us much more than the main one.
Secondly, the person who faced !!! difficulties could understand you better when you struggle with problems and do not know how to resolve it. He even could be a role model for you, and his success story could motivate you. I remember when I prepared for the GMAT exam I had a teacher. We spend a lot of time cramming questions and learning rules. But I failed my first attempt. Hence, I was so despondent that I decided to give up. Luckily, my teacher told me his own story of how he failed two attempts but finally got magnificent scores. I took two weeks to relax and then continued my preparation. I do not want to brag, but eventually, I got 760 scores that are much higher than was in my dreams.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the individual who has his or her own experience of overcoming obstacles will be a better teacher than one who just gets the result without extra effort. This is because he or she can better understand your problems, and his or her experience could inspire you.
- Your teacher has given you a large assignment that must be completed in one month You can complete the assignment gradually by working on it a little bit each day or you can complete the work quickly by working on it intensively for three or four days Whi 40
- Your city or province has recieved a large donation of money to improve the education of children It must choose between spending the money on improvement of early childhood education for children ages 4 to 7 and spending the money on improvement of educa 70
- act to restrict fishing of the menhaden 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill than people who learned it easily Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The article introduces the topic of the function of the horns of antelope and deer species 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Difficulties
.... Secondly, the person who faced !!! difficulties could understand you better when you st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62628865979 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70700068535 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574742268041 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1588644711 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7916666667 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29166666667 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202525901365 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475931162871 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054981440299 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132866713851 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416104010981 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.