No one can deny that person's success is influenced by numerous factors such as natural ability and hard work.
Some people would agree that those individuals who have hurdles in learning a skill or a new thing would be more talented than people who learned it easily while others oppose this claim.
In my point of view, I would agree that hard work and continuous training play a paramount role in a person's success.
I feel this way for several causes, which I will explore in greater detail in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, it is well-known that hard work is the key to success in life, therefore I believe that people who struggled to master a skill, are more likely to succeed because they spent far more time learning this skill.
In other words, they invested more time and effort into learning every aspect regarding the issue. As a result, they may present you with a plan based on their own experience.
For example, it is preferable for students who decide to take the TOEFL test to practice with a teacher who started from the beginning, learned the language, and practiced exam tactics alone.
I think that these types of teachers are better than those whose mother tongue is English and rely only on their fluency.
To continue, it has been proven throughout experiments that practice makes perfect.
As a result, the more times you repeat the task, the better the result.
For example, a teacher who has encountered numerous hurdles in developing his/her skills will always advise his/her students to repeat the work in order to achieve the greatest outcomes.
He/she also emphasizes that there are lessons to be learned from each attempt.
From what I have deliberated, I reckon that a teacher who has overcome hurdles in the past will be a better teacher than one who simply obtains the result without making an extra effort.
Because he or she will have a better understanding of student's problems and may be able to motivate them with his or her own experiences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
No one can deny that persons success is influenced by numerous facto...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ous training play a paramount role in a persons success. I feel this way for several c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i feel, i reckon, i think, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82028985507 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48447563837 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559420289855 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.73173732 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.866666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.53405017921 309% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28856410161 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836639440224 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852021829157 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874379605813 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872532570798 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.